Michigan Court Revived Vintage Corvette Sale Lawsuit
A buyer's claims regarding express warranty breaches and consumer protection may now proceed in court.
Updated on Oct. 7, 2026 in Auto Parts
Live Poll
Should courts strictly enforce consumer protection laws during private sales of used vehicles?
The Michigan Court of Appeals has reinstated several legal claims in a dispute over a vintage Corvette sale, reversing a lower court's previous dismissal. The ruling allows the buyer to pursue arguments regarding express warranty breaches and violations of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act.
Why it matters
This decision clarifies how state laws apply to automotive sales disputes, specifically distinguishing between contractual agreements and broader consumer protection rights. It ensures that certain misrepresentation and enrichment claims can be challenged in court rather than being dismissed early.
The court reversed the dismissal of claims involving breach of express warranty, Michigan Consumer Protection Act violations, and unjust enrichment against Matthew and Melanie Harwood. It affirmed the dismissal of implied warranty and fraud claims under MCR 2.116(C)(10).
The players
Matthew and Melanie Harwood
The defendants in the vintage Corvette sale dispute currently subject to ongoing litigation.
Michigan Court of Appeals
The state judicial body responsible for reviewing and correcting legal errors made in lower court proceedings.
The details
The court determined that the trial judge incorrectly applied Ohio law to the plaintiff's noncontractual, statutory, and equitable claims. While the purchase agreement's as-is clause remains valid for implied warranties, the appellate court ruled that the statutory and tort-based arguments require further review. The case now returns to the lower court to evaluate the merits of the express warranty and consumer protection allegations.
Timeline
The Michigan Court of Appeals issued its ruling on October 6, 2026.
The Home Front
This case highlights the complexities of cross-state vehicle transactions and the enforceability of as-is clauses in purchase agreements. It reinforces the significance of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act in providing buyers with a legal pathway to challenge potentially misleading vehicle sales.
If you are purchasing a high-value vintage vehicle, ensure your purchase agreement clearly defines any express warranties rather than relying on verbal assurances. Always consult with a legal professional if you suspect a seller has violated consumer protection laws during a significant automotive transaction.
The takeaway
This ruling serves as a reminder that as-is clauses may not shield sellers from all claims, particularly when express warranties are documented. Buyers should keep detailed records of all advertisements and written warranties provided during a vehicle sale to support potential future claims.
Further reading
For more information on navigating vehicle purchase disputes, visit the Auto Parts section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Michigan Lawyers Weekly.
Live Poll
Should courts strictly enforce consumer protection laws during private sales of used vehicles?
